ABSTRACT
Abstract Background Fear of cancer recurrence is one of the most distressing psychological consequences in cancer survivors and their informal primary caregivers (IPC). IPC of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are often their mothers, which could intensify fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and its impact on both IPC and CCS. However, the phenomenon has not been widely described in this specific population. Objective To summarize and analyze current evidence on the evaluation and management of FCR among IPC of CCS. Method A narrative review of studies included in four databases (PsycInfo, Medline, CINALH, and Web of Science) with no language or year of publication restrictions. Results Measures specifically developed to assess FCR among IPC of CCS comprising an interview and a questionnaire with initial psychometric evaluations and two short, online intervention programs based on cognitive-behavioral-contextual therapy were identified (ENGAGE and CASCAdE). Both have demonstrated acceptability in parents of CCS in high-income countries; preliminary evidence also exists of the effectivity of CASCAdE in reducing FCR. Discussion and conclusion Given the limitations of this area of psychological evaluation, the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory, originally developed for adult cancer survivors, constitutes the most suitable tool for evaluating FCR among IPC of CCS. The CASCAdE program seems a promising intervention for IPC of CSS, although cultural adaptations, evaluations of its acceptability in low- and middle-income countries, and controlled studies in large samples are still required.
Resumen Antecedentes El miedo a la recurrencia del cáncer es una de las consecuencias psicológicas más angustiantes en los supervivientes y sus cuidadores primarios informales (CPI). Los CPI de supervivientes de cáncer infantil (SCI) a menudo son sus madres, lo que podría intensificar el miedo a la recurrencia (MR) y su impacto tanto a los CPI como a los SCI. Sin embargo, el fenómeno no se ha descrito ampliamente en esta población específica. Objetivo Resumir y analizar la evidencia actual sobre la evaluación y manejo del MR entre CPI de SCI. Método Se realizó una revisión narrativa de los estudios incluidos en cuatro bases de datos (PsycInfo, Medline, CINALH y Web of Science) sin restricciones de idioma o año de publicación. Resultados Se identificaron instrumentos desarrollados específicamente para evaluar MR entre CPI de SCI que comprenden una entrevista y un cuestionario, además de dos programas de intervención en línea basados en terapia cognitivo-conductual-contextual (ENAGE y CASCAdE). Ambos demostraron aceptabilidad en los padres de SCI en países de ingresos altos. También existe evidencia preliminar de la efectividad de CASCAdE en la disminución del MR. Discusión y conclusión Dadas las limitaciones de esta área de evaluación psicológica, el Inventario del Miedo a la Recurrencia del Cáncer, desarrollado originalmente para supervivientes adultos, constituye la herramienta más adecuada para evaluar MR en los CPI de SCI. El programa CASCAdE parece una intervención prometedora para CPI de SCI, aunque aún requiere adaptaciones culturales, evaluaciones de aceptabilidad en países de ingresos medio-bajos y estudios controlados con nuestras más grandes.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The mental health problems and perceived needs of healthcare workers involved with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may vary due to individual and contextual characteristics. The objective of this study was to evaluate healthcare workers' mental health problems during the common COVID-19 exposure scenario in Mexico, comparing those on the frontline with other healthcare workers according to gender and profession, determining the main risk factors for the most frequent mental health problems. Methods: A cross-sectional online study was conducted with a non-probabilistic sample of 5,938 Mexican healthcare workers who completed brief screening measures of mental health problems and ad hoc questions about sociodemographic professional characteristics, conditions related to increased risk of COVID-19 infection, life stressors during the COVID-19 emergency, and perceived need to cope with COVID-19. Results: The identified mental health problems were insomnia, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), all of which were more frequent in frontline healthcare workers (52.1, 37.7, and 37.5%, respectively) and women (47.1, 33.0 %, and 16.3%, respectively). A lack of rest time was the main risk factor for insomnia (OR = 3.1, 95%CI 2.6-3.7, p ≤ 0.0001). Mourning the death of friends or loved ones due to COVID-19 was the main risk factor for depression (OR = 2.2, 95%CI 1.8-2.7, p ≤ 0.0001), and personal COVID-19 status was the main risk factor for PTSD (OR = 2.2, 95%CI 1.7-2.9, p ≤ 0.0001). Conclusion: The most frequent mental health problems during the common exposure scenario for COVID-19 in Mexico included the short-term psychological consequences of intense adversity. A comprehensive strategy for preventing mental health problems should focus on individuals with cumulative vulnerability and specific risk factors.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Mental Health , COVID-19 , Anxiety , Disease Outbreaks , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Personnel , Depression/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Frontline COVID-19 healthcare workers (FLHCWs) are at a high-risk of suffering occupational stress- and trauma-related mental health problems, including burnout and compassion fatigue (B&CF). Given the time limitations (due to their heavy workloads) and need to minimize face-to-face interventions (in order to avoid contagions), psychological interventions for FHCWs should be as brief and remote as possible. Objective To evaluate the usability and clarity of evidence-based psycho-educational videos to prevent B&CF, to deal with uncooperative, hostile, and anxious patients and relatives, and to use personal protective equipment (PPE), from the perspective of Mexican FLHCWs. Method Based on a convenience sampling by intensity approach, videos were distributed requesting feedback based on specific questions through WhatsApp to FLHCWs. Field notes were used to triangulate the information. Results Content analysis of feedback from a final sample of 24 participants ‒75% women, 42 ± 8.4 years old‒ yielded three general thematic categories and seven subthemes: 1. content evaluation, which included three subthemes: utility, pertinence, and practicality; 2. dissemination and other needs, with two subcategories: willingness to share and receive more videos (other needs); and 3. format aspects, also comprising two subthemes: attractiveness and duration. All participants found the videos content very beneficial, relevant, and applicable to the workplace and even in their everyday personal and family life, and were willing to share them and to receive more videos on other issues, including strategies to manage problems related to isolation. Discussion and conclusion Escalation of this remote preventive intervention to other COVID-19 centers and future similar epidemics is recommended.
Resumen Introducción Los trabajadores de la salud de primera línea (TSPL) ante el COVID-19 presentan alto riesgo de desgaste profesional y fatiga por compasión (DP&FC). Tomando en cuenta sus limitaciones de tiempo y la necesidad de minimizar las intervenciones cara a cara, las intervenciones psicológicas para los TSPL deben ser tan breves y remotas como sea posible. Objetivo Evaluar la utilidad y claridad de videos psicoeducativos basados en evidencia para prevenir DP&FC, el manejo de pacientes y familiares no cooperativos, hostiles o ansiosos, y el uso de equipo de protección personal desde la perspectiva de los TSPL mexicanos. Método Los videos se distribuyeron a los TSPL por medio de WhatsApp, solicitándoles su opinión con base en preguntas específicas. Se utilizaron notas de campo para triangular esta información. Resultados El análisis de contenido de las retroalimentaciones recibidas por una muestra final de 24 participantes ‒75% mujeres, 42 ± 8.4 años‒ arrojó tres categorías temáticas y nueve subtemas: 1. evaluación de contenido, con tres subtemas: utilidad, pertinencia y practicidad, 2. difusión y otras necesidades, con dos subcategorías: disponibilidad tanto a compartir como a recibir más videos (otras necesidades), y 3. aspectos de forma, también con dos subtemas: atractivo y duración. La totalidad consideró los videos muy benéficos, relevantes y aplicables en el trabajo y su vida diaria personal y familiar; y reportó disposición a compartirlos y a recibir más material de este tipo. Discusión y conclusión Se recomienda el escalamiento de esta medida preventiva y remota a otros centros COVID-19 y en futuras epidemias similares.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To describe self-reported experiences of gender incongruence related to discomfort and body changes to be more congruent to the desired gender, and to examine whether experiences of psychological distress related to gender identity were more strongly related to the experience of gender incongruence per se or to experiences of social rejection. Methods: This field study used a structured interview design in a purposive sample of transgender adults (aged >18 years or older) receiving health-care services in two main reference centers in Brazil. Results: A high proportion of participants (90.3%, n=93) reported experiencing psychological distress related to their gender identity and report having experienced social rejection related to their gender identity during the interview index period and that rejection by friends was the only significant predictor for psychological distress. Conclusions: Gender incongruence variables were not significant predictors of distress. This result supports the recent changes proposed by the Word Health Organization in ICD-11 to move transgender conditions from the Mental and Behavioral Disorders chapter to a new chapter on Sexual Disorders and Conditions Related to Sexual Health.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Transgender Persons/psychology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Transsexualism , Brazil , International Classification of Diseases , Qualitative Research , Self Report , Gender Identity , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction Informal Primary Caregivers (IPC) of people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) experience a significant burden, making it important to determine their specific needs. Objectives Cross-sectional study aimed at adapting and establishing the reliability of the Questionnaire on the Needs of Family Members of People with Severe Mental Disorders to identify felt and unfelt needs that may or may not have been met in IPCs of patients with BPD and suggest intervention strategies to effectively address them. Method The adapted version of the instrument was completed by 80 IPCs of patients with confirmed BPD diagnosis. Results Cronbach's alpha coefficients for different groups of needs evaluated through the instrument were: Knowledge/information = .77, Instrumental support = . 78, Participation = .63, and Personal support = .74; and for the total score = .86. The most important unmet felt needs were: 1. having information on interventions for patients and caregivers, legal and administrative aspects, and available support services; 2. having coping skills to deal with crises and manage patients' risk behaviors; 3. receiving professional care to reduce stress; and 4. being listened by health professionals, express their personal opinions, and need for rest. Conclusions The adapted instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency in IPCs of patients with BPD. The results highlight the urgent need for interventions for this population, focusing on psychoeducation, assertiveness training, stress management, and problem solving.
Resumen Introducción Los cuidadores primarios informales (CPI) de pacientes con trastorno límite de personalidad (TLP) soportan una pesada carga, por lo que es importante conocer sus necesidades específicas. Objetivos Estudio transversal dirigido a adaptar y determinar la confiabilidad del Cuestionario de Necesidades de Familiares de Personas con Trastornos Mentales Graves a fin de identificar las necesidades sentidas y no sentidas que han sido satisfechas o no en los CPI de pacientes con TLP y sugerir estrategias de intervención para que reciban una atención efectiva. Método Ochenta CPI de pacientes con diagnósticos confirmado de TLP completaron la versión adaptada del instrumento. Resultados Los coeficientes alpha de Cronbach para los cuatro grupos de necesidades evaluadas mediante el instrumento fueron: Conocimientos/información = .77, Apoyo instrumental = .78, Participación = .63, y Apoyo personal = .74; y para el total de la escala = .86. Las necesidades sentidas y no satisfechas que destacaron fueron: 1. tener información de intervenciones para el paciente y los cuidadores, aspectos legales y administrativos, y servicios disponibles para apoyarse; 2. contar con herramientas para afrontar crisis y manejar conductas de riesgo de los pacientes; 3. ser atendidos profesionalmente para reducir el estrés; y 4. ser escuchados por los profesionales de salud y tomados en cuenta en relación con sus opiniones personales y necesidad de descanso. Conclusiones El instrumento adaptado mostró una consistencia interna satisfactoria en CPI de pacientes con TLP. Los resultados resaltan la necesidad urgente de intervenciones para esta población, enfocadas en psicoeducación, entrenamiento asertivo, manejo del estrés ansiedad y solución de problemas.
ABSTRACT
La hemorragia posmenopáusica es un problema de salud importante, se calcula que en la población en general su incidencia es de al menos 10% y en El Salvador constituye el 20 % de la consulta ginecológica. La presente investigación se realizó en el periodo de enero a diciembre de 2015, la metodología utilizada para el desarrollo de la investigación fue tipo descriptiva, retrospectiva y de corte transversal; con un universo de 76 expedientes clínicos y una muestra de 21, que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Con los datos obtenidos se hizo una caracterización epidemiológica, clínica e histopatológica en mujeres que consultaron con un cuadro clínico de hemorragia postmenopáusica, en el Hospital Nacional de la Mujer; los resultados fueron obtenidos mediante el procedimiento de legrado diagnóstico y reporte de biopsia de endometrio. De las edades de las pacientes, la mayoría de incidencia fue en el rango de 50-59 años. Dentro del perfil de las pacientes se encontró: obesidad, hipertensión arterial y diabetes mellitus como comorbilidad; los reportes histopatológicos más frecuentes fueron pólipo endometrial e hiperplasia endometrial. No obstante, en un 19% de las pacientes se documentó patología maligna del endometrio
Subject(s)
Uterine Hemorrhage , Postmenopause , Gynecology , ObstetricsABSTRACT
ANTECEDENTES: La comunicación enfermera-paciente es fundamental para la aplicación de los cuidados en salud. El presente estudio aborda la percepción de pacientes sobre la comunicación verbal y no verbal con sus enfermeras. Entre los instrumentos para su evaluación destaca la Herramienta para la Evaluación del Cuidado (CAT por sus siglas en inglés), pero diferencias culturales y educativas de la población mexicana limitan su aplicabilidad en nuestro contexto.OBJETIVO: Diseñar y validar un instrumento sobre la percepción de los pacientes sobre el comportamiento de comunicación de enfermeras (denominado CECOP), en función de lo que observan pacientes mexicanos.MÉTODO: Con base en una entrevista exploratoria a 29 pacientes, se diseñó el CECOP con 25 reactivos, se estableció validez de contenido con jueces expertos (eliminando dos reactivos) y se aplicó a 150 pacientes. Se empleó análisis factorial con método de extracción de análisis de componentes principales y rotación Varimax. Se estableció la validez convergente entre el CECOP y el CAT y entre el CECOP y escalas numéricas que valoraron comprensión empática y satisfacción del paciente.RESULTADOS: La validez de constructo lo redujo a diez reactivos en dos factores (empatía y respeto); con Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) y prueba de Bartlett estadísticamente significativas (p≤.001). La varianza explicada fue de 54.58%. La correlación entre los puntajes totales del CECOP (10 reactivos) y el CAT fue .459, el CECOP y la escala de comprensión fue .419; el CECOP y la escala de satisfacción, .495; todas, estadísticamente significativas (p≤.001).DISCUSIÓN Y CONCLUSIÓN: El CECOP permite evaluar los cuidados profesionales en su dimensión humana, desde la percepción de los pacientes, y sugerir propuestas para mejorar la comunicación de las enfermeras.
BACKGROUND: Nurse-patient communication has been established as a key component of professional healthcare. The present study examined the patients' perception of the verbal and non-verbal communication skills of nurses. Although the Caring Assessment Tool (CAT) stands among the instruments available to evaluate these communication skills, cultural and schooling characteristics limit its direct applicability to the Mexican context.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design and validate an instrument on the patient-recorded Nurse Communication Behavior (CECOP, for its acronym in Spanish) based on the Mexican patient's experience.METHOD: Based on exploratory interviews with 29 patients, a first draft of the CECOP was designed. The instrument was validated by independent expert judges and after the elimination of two items it was used with 150 patients. The validity was assessed by a factor analysis extraction through Principal Component Analysis and Varimax Rotation. Convergence validity was established between the CAT and the CECOP and between the CECOP and numeric scales that evaluate empathy and patient satisfaction.RESULTS: Construct Validity reduced the CECOP to 10 items in two factors (empathy and respect) with statistically significant KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) and Bartlett's Test (p≤.001). The explained variation was 54.58%. The correlation between the CECOP score (10 items) and the CAT was .459. Between the CECOP and the empathy scale and between the CECOP and the satisfaction scale the correlations were .419 and .495, respectively. All correlations were statistically significant (p≤.001).DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The CECOP can be used to evaluate professional care in its human dimension from the patient's perspective and to suggest improvements in the nurses communication.
ABSTRACT
La depresión constituye un problema importante de salud pública. En el mundo, representa la cuarta causa de discapacidad en cuanto a la pérdida de años de vida saludables. En México ocupa el primer lugar de discapacidad para las mujeres y el noveno para los hombres. La depresión tiene una alta co-ocurrencia con otros trastornos como la ansiedad, el consumo de sustancias, la diabetes y las enfermedades cardiacas. Pese al impacto que tiene este trastorno, una gran proporción de personas no acude a tratamiento, retrasa mucho la búsqueda de ayuda, o bien no recibe la asistencia adecuada. El propósito de este ensayo es exponer el resultado de una breve revisión de investigaciones que permiten ubicar la depresión como un problema de salud pública en México. Se abordan la prevalencia y los factores asociados, las brechas de atención, el uso de servicios y los tratamientos disponibles. Al final se plantean algunas de las implicaciones para la investigación y para las políticas públicas.
Depression is an important public health problem. It is the fourth cause of disease in the world in terms of lost years of healthy life. In Mexico, it ranks first in terms disability for women and ninth for men. There is a high comorbidity between depression and other mental disorders such as anxiety and substance abuse, as well as other serious and chronic physical conditions (e.g. diabetes, and heart disease). Despite the impact of depressive disorders in the quality of life of the population, there is a large proportion of people who don't get treatment, delaying seeking help and thus don't receive adequate assistance. The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of depression status in the Mexican population from a public health perspective; it includes prevalence and associated factors, gaps in care, characteristics of the use of services and treatments available. The paper concludes with a presentation of the implications for research and mental health policy in Mexico.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Depression , Public Policy , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/therapy , Mexico/epidemiology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
Introduction Perception of environment and reality stems mainly from factors determined by social and cultural influences. Several socialization processes promote the development of relations that endorse or reject certain values or identities. Unfortunately, many of these relations arise from prejudiced values that generate negative attitudes such as stigmatization or discrimination toward some persons. According to psychosocial models, generation of stigma is a consequence of three aspects: lack of knowledge about the person's condition (ignorance); development of negative attitudes (prejudice) and a tendency to exclude or reject some individuals (discrimination). Particularly, in mental health problems, general public knowledge of severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia frequently develops in accordance to myths and misconceptions. For example, schizophrenics are commonly viewed as mad and incompetent individuals that produce fear and rejection. These erroneous conceptions originate from considering that they are incapable of controlling their acts, thus giving rise to aggressive, violent or dangerous conducts. Stigmatization impacts patients increasing depressive symptoms, anxiety and social withdrawal. Stigma also has a negative impact on diagnosis and treatment; timely diagnostic interventions and specialized treatments are frequently delayed in stigmatized individuals. Although it is reasonable to anticipate that stigmatization attitudes are more common among persons with low cultural levels, many studies have demonstrated that unfortunately this problem is also present in many health professionals, including those who work with the mentally ill. For these reasons different attempts have developed to reduce stigma by means of mental health literacy interventions oriented to modify and eliminate misconceptions about mental patients and their illness. In this sense, mental health literacy is defined as any educational intervention aimed to increase recognition, management and prevention of mental illness. Many studies have demonstrated that this type of interventions have a positive impact in reducing negative attitudes toward patients, diminishing in consequence treatment gap. In accordance to this theoretical framework, the principal objective of this study was to evaluate in a group of female psychology students, their attitudes toward mental illness determining their perception of danger and aggressiveness in a schizophrenic patient. We hypothesized that perception of dangerousness and aggressiveness will correlate with more negative attitudes to mental illness. Additionally, we compared attitudes to severe mental illness according to other variables related to mental health literacy such as knowledge of etiology of illness and treatment options, among female student in their first half of their career and female student in their second half. We hypothesized that advanced student will have a higher level of mental health literacy and less negative attitudes to mental illness. Method A total of 110 female psychology students from a university in Mexico City were included in the study. Group's mean age (±SD) was 21.6 (1.7) years (range 19-33 years). All subjects gave their consent to participate in a voluntary and anonymous manner. Sixty five students (59.1%) were at the initial half-stage of their career (1st to 5th semester), and forty five (40.9%) were at their last half-stage (6th to 10th semester). The study was approved by the Institutional Research and Ethical Committees (Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente), and by the university's authorities. The Opinions about Mental Illness Scale (OMI), previously translated and standardized in our country (OMI-M), was used to evaluate personal attitudes toward severe mentally ill persons. OMI-M is a 34-item self-report questionnaire which evaluates attitudes utilizing a 5-points Liker scale procedure (1 = totally disagree; 5=totally agree). Evaluation includes six factors: 1. Separatism, which emphasizes the persons' perceived differences about a mental disorder and the desire of keeping a distance to be safe; 2. Stereotyping, defined as conceiving mentally ill persons in accordance to certain behavioral and intellectual patterns; 3. Restrictiveness, which includes items that uphold an uncertain notion regarding the rights of mentally ill persons; 4. Benevolence, which evaluates compassion to the mentally ill; 5. Pessimistic prediction, referring to the perception that mentally ill persons are incapable of improving on their symptoms and how society is also not optimistic in this respect; 6. Stigmatization, build upon items that perceive mental illness as a cause of shame. The Public Aggressiveness Concept Questionnaire, a self-rated instrument was also applied in the study. This questionnaire evaluates the perception of aggressiveness after reviewing a standardized clinical vignette of a patient with an active paranoid schizophrenia. The reviewer is asked to answer questions regarding the identification of aggressive conduct in the vignette, including the presence and intensity of verbal and physical violence. In another section, the way symptoms could be controlled is evaluated. Additional questions are included in the final section of the questionnaire aimed to evaluate concepts such as if the reviewer considers that the person in the vignette has a mental illness, what causes might originate this condition, and if he or she perceives the subject as socially dangerous. Data analysis was carried utilizing the SPSS, version 17.0, statistical program. Categorical variables description was done with rates and percentages; continuous variables were analyzed with means and standard deviation.
Introducción El temor y el rechazo han sido las principales actitudes negativas hacia las personas con trastornos mentales graves como la esquizofrenia. Éstas surgen de la percepción pública de que los pacientes no tienen control sobre su comportamiento y son agresivos, violentos y/o peligrosos; tienen un impacto directo en las personas que padecen esquizofrenia y sus familiares, y aun cuando podría esperarse lo contrario, diversos estudios han mostrado que los profesionales de la salud en general, y de la salud mental en lo particular, muestran actitudes negativas hacia los pacientes con esquizofrenia. Diversos estudios internacionales han demostrado que las campañas dirigidas a incrementar la alfabetización en salud mental (ASM) son efectivas para modificar las actitudes negativas hacia las personas con trastornos mentales. Sin embargo, las necesidades de ASM pueden tener variaciones locales, por lo que resulta necesario conocer las actitudes hacia la enfermedad mental y los factores asociados a las mismas en las poblaciones blanco a las que se dirigirán las campañas antiestigma en una región particular. En esta dirección, el objetivo principal del presente estudio fue comparar las actitudes de mujeres estudiantes de psicología hacia las personas con trastornos mentales graves de acuerdo a la agresividad y peligrosidad percibida de un paciente con esquizofrenia. Adicionalmente, las actitudes hacia las personas con trastornos mentales graves así como las variables relacionadas con la alfabetización en salud mental se comparan entre las mujeres que cursaban la primera mitad de la licenciatura en psicología y aquellas que cursaban la segunda mitad. Método Se incluyó un total de 110 mujeres con una edad promedio de 21.6±1.7 años, estudiantes de la licenciatura en psicología de una universidad de la zona metropolitana de la Ciudad de México que aceptaron participar en el estudio de forma voluntaria y anónima. El 59.1% (n=65) se encontraba cursando la primera mitad de la licenciatura (del 1° al 5° semestre) y el 40.9% (n=45) restante, la segunda mitad (del 6° al 10° semestre). El total de la muestra completó la Escala de Opiniones sobre la Enfermedad Mental en Población Mexicana (OMI-M) para determinar las actitudes hacia las personas con trastornos mentales graves, así como el Cuestionario de Concepto Público de Agresividad (CPA), que valora el concepto público de agresividad del paciente con esquizofrenia con base en la presentación de una viñeta clínica de un paciente con esquizofrenia paranoide. Resultados El 95.5% (n=105) de las estudiantes reconocieron la presencia de una enfermedad mental en la viñeta clínica. No obstante, tan sólo el 70.9% (n=78) consideró las intervenciones psiquiátricas como las más adecuadas para el control de los síntomas. El 59.1 % (n=65) de las estudiantes consideró que el sujeto descrito en la viñeta podría ser agresivo de alguna forma y tan sólo 12.7% (n=14) lo calificó como peligroso para la sociedad. Las estudiantes que percibieron agresivo al paciente de la viñeta mostraron mayores puntajes en las áreas de restricción, predicción pesimista y en la puntuación total del OMI-M. De forma similar, aquellas que consideraron peligroso al paciente tuvieron mayores actitudes negativas en términos de separatismo, estereotipos y puntuación total del OMI-M. No se encontraron diferencias en las variables de alfabetización en salud mental (reconocimiento de la enfermedad, causas atribuibles y tratamiento sugerido), ni en la percepción de agresión y peligrosidad, ni en cuanto a las diferentes áreas evaluadas por el OMI-M entre alumnas que cursaban la primera mitad de la licenciatura en psicología y aquellas que cursaban la segunda mitad. Discusión Un alto porcentaje de estudiantes de psicología consideró agresivo al paciente descrito en la viñeta, y tal como se esperaba, esta concepción se relacionó con mayores actitudes negativas, tales como mayor nivel de restricción y de predicción pesimista. Adicionalmente, la percepción de la persona con enfermedad mental como alguien con capacidades limitadas y comportamiento extraño parece promover la distancia social. Tanto la percepción de agresión como la de peligrosidad y las actitudes negativas asociadas en esta muestra nos hablan del poco entendimiento que pudieran tener los estudiantes de psicología en relación con las experiencias vividas por los pacientes. Aun cuando nuestros resultados no pueden ser generalizados al total de los estudiantes de psicología del país, es posible sugerir la inclusión al currículo educativo de información clara y objetiva sobre aspectos psicosociales de la enfermedad -estigma y actitudes hacia la enfermedad- y no sólo aspectos teóricos sobre la fisiopatología del trastorno y características sintomáticas del padecimiento; así como el contacto regular, tanto hospitalario como comunitario, con los pacientes.
ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: O objetivo do estudo foi examinar o papel do gênero no endosso dos sintomas incluídos tanto na Classificação Internacional de Doenças-10ª Edição quanto no Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais-4ª Edição. MÉTODO: Seiscentos pacientes tratados por problemas ligados ao álcool em serviços ambulatórios de saúde no México foram avaliados com o Módulo sobre Abuso de Substâncias da Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTADOS: A análise fatorial confirmatória com a Classificação Internacional de Doenças-10ª Edição e o Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais-4ª Edição produziu dois fatores, que incluíram uma combinação de abuso/uso nocivo de álcool e sintomas de dependência, que explicaram 40 por cento e 49,2 por cento da variância total, respectivamente. No grupo de pacientes abuso/uso nocivo, os sintomas e as consequências sociais diferiram entre os gêneros: síndrome de abstinência, falta de controle e problemas jurídicos foram mais frequentes nos homens, enquanto as mulheres apresentaram maiores taxas de tentativas de abandonar o álcool e dificuldades para realizar atividades diárias. Fatores específicos de gênero diferenciaram abuso/uso nocivo da dependência, como a perda de controle e o tempo gasto para beber, no caso dos homens, e do desejo de beber entre as mulheres, de acordo com os critérios de dependência do Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais-4ª Edição, e presença de sintomas físicos em homens, problemas sociais/família, e desejo e esforço fútil de parar de beber em mulheres, segundo o critério de dependência da Classificação Internacional de Doenças-10ª Edição. CONCLUSÃO: Futuros sistemas de classificação da toxicomania devem levar em conta as diferenças entre os sexos, a fim de ajudar a suprimir a lacuna de tratamento para as mulheres.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the role of gender in the endorsement of symptoms included in both the International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition. METHOD: Six hundred patients treated for alcohol-related problems in outpatient services in Mexico were evaluated with the Substance Abuse Module of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analyses using the International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition criteria produced two factors that included a combination of abuse/harmful alcohol use and dependence symptoms, which explained 40 percent and 49.2 percent of the total variance, respectively. In the abuse/harmful use groups of patients, symptoms and social consequences differed according to gender: withdrawal syndrome, lack of control and legal problems were more frequent in men, while women exhibited higher rates of attempts to give up alcohol and difficulties to accomplish daily activities. Specific gender-related factors differentiated abuse/harmful use from dependence, such as loss of control and time spent to drink in the case of men and desire to drink among women, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4th Edition dependence criteria; and presence of physical symptoms in men and family/social problems, craving, and futile effort to stop drinking in women, according to the International Classification of Diseases-10th Edition dependence criteria. CONCLUSION: Future classification systems of substance abuse disorders should take into account differences between genders in order to help closing the treatment gap for women.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Alcohol-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , International Classification of Diseases , Sex Factors , Alcohol-Related Disorders/classification , MexicoABSTRACT
Introduction In Mexico, alcohol abuse involves overhead costs in terms of premature mortality caused by their related health problems. It is estimated that by itself it implies 9% of the total burden of disease in the country. Although effective interventions exist to treat this problem, national public policies are not integrated and in many occasions its real application is questioned. Cost-effectiveness studies are tools that permit to develop and to implement health public policies because they imply a rigorous economic evaluation and comparison of those in order to determine which obtains better balance between effectiveness and financial viability. Thus, the aim of the present study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent and to control alcohol abuse in Mexico, based on the proposed methodology by the World Health Organization. It will permit to generate national public policies with local evidence and to carry out evaluations of their impact, as well as international comparisons. Method The World Health Organization methodology named WHO-CHOICE (CHOosing the Interventions that are Cost-Effective) was developed to evaluate and to select the most cost-effective interventions for the prevention or treatment of health problems. It is considered a generalized cost-effective analysis; therefore direct or tangible costs are particularly analyzed (vs. indirect or intangible costs). Procedure First, WHO-CHOICE analysis requires information from different sources about both the illness or problem and the preventive or therapeutic interventions to evaluate. Then, information is processed by special software. As annual standard discount of 3% is done to obtain and to compare the present supplies values; and age of individuals is praised, giving more weight to the young phases. Finally, the results are presented in terms of intervention cost-effectiveness to reduce the burden of disease, defined in terms of disability adjusted life years or DALYs. Interventions The following interventions were evaluated: 1. Current Setting: Taxes and random tests for the detection of alcoholic breath (breathalyzer); 2. Increment of 25% to taxes of products with harmful degree of alcohol; 3. Increment of 50% to taxes of products with harmful degree of alcohol; 4. Reduction of availability of products with harmful degree of alcohol; 5. Regulation of the associated publicity; 6. Brief preventive-persuasiveness intervention in the first level of attention; and 7. Random Tests for detection of alcoholic breath (breathalyzer). Results The independent measure with greater cost-effectiveness to avoid DALYs due to alcohol abuse was the increment of taxes, which is better when it reaches 50%. All increment of taxes avoids (with or without discount and adjustment by age) more than 1 50 000 DALYs per year. The increment of 50% surpasses even 300 000 DALYs per year (without adjustment neither discount). In contrast, none of the other interventions (with adjustment and discount) reaches 50 000 DALYs per year. Besides, the increments of taxes are always more economic than the interventions remainder. The extreme comparison of DALY avoided per year costs is among 50% taxes increment, which requires an investment of 567 Mexican pesos, and the brief intervention in the first level of attention, that implies an expense of 14,342 Mexican pesos. After taxes increment, effective independent interventions to reduce DALYs in Mexico include, in this order: reduction of the offering, integral prohibition of alcohol consumption publicity, brief intervention in the first level of attention, and the random test of alcoholic breath. Finally, the best integral strategy was a combination of the following measures: increment of taxes, greater proportion of people attended with brief interventions, control of publicity, and reduction of availability. Discussion In Mexico, as in many countries of the world, the increase of taxes was the most cost-effective intervention to reduce burden caused from abuse alcohol. This kind of interventions should consider the possible differential impacts according to the socioeconomical status of individuals or groups. Another related problem could be an increment of informal market. Therefore, it is necessary to complement the intervention with strategies directed at reducing the volume of alcoholic beverages that do not pay taxes. All other interventions (not taxes increment) were less cost-effective probably because they have considerably higher costs and smaller impact due their dispensation is eventual. Results of this exercise can have a positive impact among Mexican public policies on the field if the relevance of integral strategies is recognized, with political support, and having achieved a consensus of the population on the advantages of its orchestration.
Introducción Los análisis de costo-efectividad se sugieren como una herramienta esencial para gestionar e implementar políticas públicas en salud, pues permiten compararlas a fin de conocer cuál es la que obtiene mejor balance entre efectividad y viabilidad financiera. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue determinar el costo-efectividad de las intervenciones para prevenir y controlar el abuso de alcohol en México. Método Se utilizó la metodología WHO-CHOICE de la Organización Mundial de la Salud: un análisis de costo-efectividad generalizado (vs. particular) que toma en cuenta prácticamente los costos directos o tangibles (vs. los intangibles). El procedimiento implica la obtención de información de diversas fuentes, tanto de la enfermedad o problema en cuestión como de las intervenciones preventivas o terapéuticas a evaluar. Esta información se carga entonces para su análisis en un software o programa ad hoc. Se hace un descuento estándar de 3% anual para obtener y comparar el valor presente de los insumos, y se pondera la edad de los individuos, dando más peso a las etapas jóvenes. Finalmente, los resultados se plantean en términos de costo-efectividad de las intervenciones para reducir la carga de la enfermedad, definida en años vividos con discapacidad o disfunción (DALYs, por sus siglas en inglés: disability adjusted life-years). Las intervenciones que se evaluaron son: 1. Escenario actual: Impuestos al consumo de productos con grado nocivo de alcohol y pruebas aleatorias a automovilistas para detección de aliento alcohólico (alcoholímetro); 2. Incremento de 25% en los impuestos al consumo de productos con grado nocivo de alcohol; 3. Incremento de 50% en los impuestos al consumo de productos con grado nocivo de alcohol; 4. Reducción de la disponibilidad de productos con grado nocivo de alcohol (incrementar edad permitida del cliente, horario de venta, densidad de puntos de venta y corresponsabilidad del expendedor); 5. Regulación de la publicidad asociada al consumo de productos con grado nocivo de alcohol; 6. Intervención preventi-va-persuasiva breve en el primer nivel de atención; 7. Pruebas aleatorias a automovilistas para detección de aliento alcohólico. Resultados La medida independiente con mayor costo-efectividad para evitar DALYs debidos al abuso de alcohol fue el incremento de impuestos, más aún cuando llega a 50%. Todos los incrementos de impuestos evitan por sí solos (con o sin descuento y ajuste por edad) más de 150 000 DALYs por año. El incremento de 50% supera incluso los 300 000 (sin ajuste ni descuento). En cambio, ninguna de las otras intervenciones (con ajuste y descuento) llega a los 50 000. Además, los incrementos de impuestos son siempre más económicos que el resto de las intervenciones. La comparación extrema del costo por DALY evitado al año es entre el incremento de impuestos a 50%, que requiere una inversión de 567 pesos, y el consejo breve en el primer nivel de atención, que implica un gasto de hasta 14,342 pesos. Finalmente, la mejor estrategia integral fue la combinación de las siguientes medidas: incremento de impuestos, mayor proporción de personas atendidas con intervenciones breves, control de la publicidad y reducción de la disponibilidad de alcohol. Discusión Aunque el aumento de impuestos resultó, como en muchos países del mundo, la intervención aislada más costo-efectiva para reducir la carga que ocasiona el alcohol, deben tomarse en cuenta sus posibles impactos diferenciales en tanto el poder adquisitivo de los individuos o grupos y sobre el crecimiento del mercado de alcohol informal. Esto último sugiere la necesidad de acompañarle con estrategias dirigidas a reducir el volumen de bebidas alcohólicas que no pagan impuestos. El resto de las intervenciones fueron menos efectivas en tanto que tienen un impacto considerablemente menor cuando se dispensan de forma aislada, debido principalmente a sus altos costos.